Discussion:
More on DS movie, plot etc.
(too old to reply)
m***@comcast.net
2011-05-18 18:36:44 UTC
Permalink
Love new info!
This website is pretty cool also..

http://dailydead.com/dark-shadows-plot-synopsis-cast-list-revealed/
Marcovaldo
2011-05-18 19:22:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@comcast.net
Love new info!
This website is pretty cool also..
http://dailydead.com/dark-shadows-plot-synopsis-cast-list-revealed/
So,



(Not a major spoiler, but just in case someone is sensitive)














he really *will* be from England!
m***@comcast.net
2011-05-18 19:30:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Marcovaldo
Post by m***@comcast.net
Love new info!
This website is pretty cool also..
http://dailydead.com/dark-shadows-plot-synopsis-cast-list-revealed/
So,
(Not a major spoiler, but just in case someone is sensitive)
he really *will* be from England!
LOL
i thought that too!
Kishin
2011-05-18 19:30:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@comcast.net
Love new info!
This website is pretty cool also..
http://dailydead.com/dark-shadows-plot-synopsis-cast-list-revealed/
Wow, that actually sounds halfway decent. I hope they pull it off!

--

Kishin
m***@comcast.net
2011-05-18 19:31:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kishin
Post by m***@comcast.net
Love new info!
This website is pretty cool also..
http://dailydead.com/dark-shadows-plot-synopsis-cast-list-revealed/
Wow, that actually sounds halfway decent. I hope they pull it off!
--
Kishin
I agree.. i gotta say- i'm not totally displased with what little info
i've heard about it so far.
m***@comcast.net
2011-05-18 19:32:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@comcast.net
Post by Kishin
Post by m***@comcast.net
Love new info!
This website is pretty cool also..
http://dailydead.com/dark-shadows-plot-synopsis-cast-list-revealed/
Wow, that actually sounds halfway decent. I hope they pull it off!
--
Kishin
I agree.. i gotta say- i'm not totally displased with what little info
i've heard about it so far.
Oops.. "displeased".
I am Typo Monkey!! ~>:o/
Artys
2011-05-18 22:45:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@comcast.net
Post by Kishin
Post by m***@comcast.net
Love new info!
This website is pretty cool also..
http://dailydead.com/dark-shadows-plot-synopsis-cast-list-revealed/
Wow, that actually sounds halfway decent. I hope they pull it off!
--
Kishin
I agree.. i gotta say- i'm not totally displased with what little info
i've heard about it so far.
It sounds promising, it really does. 1972 would be after the original
television appearance of the show (1965). Why?
m***@comcast.net
2011-05-18 22:59:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@comcast.net
Post by Kishin
Post by m***@comcast.net
Love new info!
This website is pretty cool also..
http://dailydead.com/dark-shadows-plot-synopsis-cast-list-revealed/
Wow, that actually sounds halfway decent. I hope they pull it off!
--
Kishin
I agree.. i gotta say- i'm not totally displased with what little info
i've heard about it so far.
It sounds promising, it really does.  1972 would be after the original
television appearance of the show (1965).  Why?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I was puzzled by the 1972 as opposed to '71 when it went off the air.
Who knows.. perhaps there was something current in the news they want
to tie into the plot in some way.
I was only 4 in '72, so i wouldn't know what.. and that is just
speculation on my part.
I do love that they are keeping with the 70's vibe and theme though.
Awesome!
Wiseguy
2011-05-18 23:10:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Artys
Post by m***@comcast.net
Post by Kishin
Post by m***@comcast.net
Love new info!
This website is pretty cool also..
http://dailydead.com/dark-shadows-plot-synopsis-cast-list-revealed/
Wow, that actually sounds halfway decent. I hope they pull it off!
--
Kishin
I agree.. i gotta say- i'm not totally displased with what little info
i've heard about it so far.
It sounds promising, it really does. 1972 would be after the original
television appearance of the show (1965). Why?
1966: appearance of show
1967: appearance of Barnabas
Marcovaldo
2011-05-18 23:57:44 UTC
Permalink
It sounds promising, it really does.  1972 would be after the original
television appearance of the show (1965).  Why?
Disco, baby.
Kishin
2011-05-19 02:05:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Marcovaldo
Post by Artys
It sounds promising, it really does. 1972 would be after the original
television appearance of the show (1965). Why?
Disco, baby.
Disco didn't really catch on till 76 or 77, so I don't think we'll have
to suffer through that.

--

Kishin
vince garcia
2011-05-20 00:03:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kishin
Post by Marcovaldo
Post by Artys
It sounds promising, it really does. 1972 would be after the original
television appearance of the show (1965). Why?
Disco, baby.
Disco didn't really catch on till 76 or 77, so I don't think we'll have
to suffer through that.
--
Kishin
the music in the 72 era was really great, though!
Kishin
2011-05-20 01:01:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by vince garcia
Post by Kishin
Post by Marcovaldo
Post by Artys
It sounds promising, it really does. 1972 would be after the original
television appearance of the show (1965). Why?
Disco, baby.
Disco didn't really catch on till 76 or 77, so I don't think we'll have
to suffer through that.
--
Kishin
the music in the 72 era was really great, though!
Yes. I recently looked at the number of songs I loved from various years
in my childhood and figured that 1972-1974 were the best years. Some
great stuff then.

--

Kishin
Tim
2011-05-20 14:36:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by vince garcia
Post by Kishin
Post by Marcovaldo
Post by Artys
It sounds promising, it really does. 1972 would be after the
original television appearance of the show (1965). Why?
Disco, baby.
Disco didn't really catch on till 76 or 77, so I don't think we'll
have to suffer through that.
--
Kishin
the music in the 72 era was really great, though!
Yeah. Maybe there'll even be a scene of Carolyn and Buzz going wild at an
MC5 show at the Blue Whale.

Tim
--
"That's the problem with goals. They become
the thing you talk about instead of the thing
you do."
~ Cherry Darling
D***@webtv.net
2011-05-21 15:58:17 UTC
Permalink
It sounds great so far, but unless I totally missed it, no mention of
Josette?

Diva
--
DivaMagenta @}{~~>~~~>~~~>~~~~~

"Religion is man's futile attempt to reach out to God, trying to earn
His favor. Christianity is the good news that God has reached out in
love to us through His Son, because He knows that our arms are not long
enough..."
http://divamagenta.250free.com
Kishin
2011-05-21 16:15:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by D***@webtv.net
It sounds great so far, but unless I totally missed it, no mention of
Josette?
Good point! I wonder if they dropped her from the story. They ARE trying
to fit an awful lot into a 2 hour movie.

--

Kishin
D***@webtv.net
2011-05-21 19:19:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kishin
Good point! I wonder if they dropped her
from the story. They ARE trying to fit an
awful lot into a 2 hour movie.
True, but it is *really* hard to imagine telling Barnabas' story without
the pivotal Angelique/Josette/Barnabas triangle that brought about his
fate.

I notice that the cast list at IMDb is surprisingly brief. Maybe
they'll add more names later?

Can't wait to hear Danny Elfman's score!
--
DivaMagenta @}{~~>~~~>~~~>~~~~~

"Religion is man's futile attempt to reach out to God, trying to earn
His favor. Christianity is the good news that God has reached out in
love to us through His Son, because He knows that our arms are not long
enough..."
http://divamagenta.250free.com
Z***@yahoo.com
2011-05-22 06:09:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by D***@webtv.net
Post by Kishin
Good point! I wonder if they dropped her
from the story. They ARE trying to fit an
awful lot into a 2 hour movie.
True, but it is *really* hard to imagine telling Barnabas' story without
the pivotal Angelique/Josette/Barnabas triangle that brought about his
fate.
I notice that the cast list at IMDb is surprisingly brief. Maybe
they'll add more names later?
Can't wait to hear Danny Elfman's score!
Lets also consider the folowing:
This Dark Shadows movie will be two hours long.

It's not fair to compare it to the original series
which was 1,260 hours long give or take a few hours.
(there were what five days where the taping of
Dark Shadows went darK?).

You can do alot more with the day time series than
you can in a two hour movie.

And make no mistake about it, the studio has
impressed on the producers of the movie that
it will be only two hours long. (The studios want
the film two hours long so they can get as
many showings in one day as they can.)
Kishin
2011-05-22 10:25:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Z***@yahoo.com
Post by D***@webtv.net
Post by Kishin
Good point! I wonder if they dropped her
from the story. They ARE trying to fit an
awful lot into a 2 hour movie.
True, but it is *really* hard to imagine telling Barnabas' story without
the pivotal Angelique/Josette/Barnabas triangle that brought about his
fate.
I notice that the cast list at IMDb is surprisingly brief. Maybe
they'll add more names later?
Can't wait to hear Danny Elfman's score!
This Dark Shadows movie will be two hours long.
It's not fair to compare it to the original series
which was 1,260 hours long give or take a few hours.
(there were what five days where the taping of
Dark Shadows went darK?).
You can do alot more with the day time series than
you can in a two hour movie.
And make no mistake about it, the studio has
impressed on the producers of the movie that
it will be only two hours long. (The studios want
the film two hours long so they can get as
many showings in one day as they can.)
Okay, it's time for me to be a pedantic twit. There were 1,225 episodes
of "Dark Shadows," so, given that each episode was about 21 minutes
long, it was "only" about about 429 hour long.

But your point is still valid. Even though the film is only trying to
adapt a small percentage of the overall series, it still has a big
challenge. "House of Dark Shadows" attempted to adapt the Barnabas story
to film, with some success, but then, it didn't get much into the 1795
part.

Barnabas first appeared in episode 210 and the 1795 flashback ended with
episode 460, so guestimate the arc they're trying to adapt as being 250
episodes long, or about 87 hours. That's a 43:1 compression ratio.

It will be interesting to see how (or even if) they manage to pull this
off. One thing's for sure, they're going to have to make some changes.

--

Kishin
D***@webtv.net
2011-05-22 17:16:50 UTC
Permalink
IMHO, the best way to approach it would be to focus on the core Collins
family, and especially Barnabas/Josette/Angelique. Spend the first
30-45 minutes in 1795, with his relationships with both women,
ultimately choosing Josette. Add in a bit of his normal, everyday life
with his family, and end that segment with Angelique's jealous rage and
the vampire curse, with its ramifications (Josette and Jeremiah's
"betrayal," Sarah's death, Josette's plummet from Widow's Hill).

Then spend the rest of the movie in modern day, with Barnabas getting
acclimated into a whole new world, insinuating himself into the
present-day Collins family, falling for the Josette reincarnation
(Maggie or Vicki), dealing with Angelique, and seeking a cure from Julia
as his basic humanity begins to return.

Might be interesting to skip the whole Jealous Julia complication and
just let them be mutually-respected friends. It would keep the drama
from getting spread too thin between too many subplots, and be a nice
twist, I think.

Basically, keep it tight: tell the Barnabas story through the love
triangle, his curse, and its impact on the Collins family, past and
present. Unless Vicki is Josette 2.0, she could easily be a minor
character as David's governness, foregoing the "witch switch" and
letting 1795 be simply the beginning and background of the story, not a
time-travel element. Yes, Vicki was the original focal point of DS, but
to reach a wider audience, they need to focus on the pivotal character
that everybody automatically associates with the show, and that's
Barnabas.

Some less-vital characters and plot points could be briefly represented,
while others could be ditched altogether.

Just my humble two cents... :)
--
DivaMagenta @}{~~>~~~>~~~>~~~~~

"Religion is man's futile attempt to reach out to God, trying to earn
His favor. Christianity is the good news that God has reached out in
love to us through His Son, because He knows that our arms are not long
enough..."
http://divamagenta.250free.com
Z***@yahoo.com
2011-05-23 01:53:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kishin
But your point is still valid. Even though the film is only trying to
adapt a small percentage of the overall series, it still has a big
challenge. "House of Dark Shadows" attempted to adapt the Barnabas story
to film, with some success, but then, it didn't get much into the 1795
part.
I for one loved the original Dark Shadows series but absolutely hated
the Dark Shadows movies. I don't think there was anything worthwhile
about either movie. Both movies seemed to be a vain attempt to
cram 1225 epsidoes into a two hour box. The result stunk to high
heavan, came off very badly. I wish that neither movie had
ever been made. For me they ruined a a great series.


Just because you "can" make a movie doesn't mean you should.

When you have movies/shows about vampires there is
so much new territory they could explore
without rehashing the same old tired story lines
that we've seen already.

Just think about all the vampires on various shows that
have been around for many years, think about all that
history they personally wtinessed.

The was one of the great things they had in shows
like Forever Knight and Angel. I'd love to see Dark
Shadows go that route instead of rehashing what
we already saw in 1225 episodes.

Been there, done that.
Kishin
2011-05-23 04:03:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Z***@yahoo.com
Post by Kishin
But your point is still valid. Even though the film is only trying to
adapt a small percentage of the overall series, it still has a big
challenge. "House of Dark Shadows" attempted to adapt the Barnabas story
to film, with some success, but then, it didn't get much into the 1795
part.
I for one loved the original Dark Shadows series but absolutely hated
the Dark Shadows movies. I don't think there was anything worthwhile
about either movie. Both movies seemed to be a vain attempt to
cram 1225 epsidoes into a two hour box. The result stunk to high
heavan, came off very badly. I wish that neither movie had
ever been made. For me they ruined a a great series.
Just because you "can" make a movie doesn't mean you should.
When you have movies/shows about vampires there is
so much new territory they could explore
without rehashing the same old tired story lines
that we've seen already.
Just think about all the vampires on various shows that
have been around for many years, think about all that
history they personally wtinessed.
The was one of the great things they had in shows
like Forever Knight and Angel. I'd love to see Dark
Shadows go that route instead of rehashing what
we already saw in 1225 episodes.
Been there, done that.
Eh, I enjoyed "House" enough, for what it was. Not as much as the
series, no, but it was okay. "Night" wasn't great, but it's hard to
judge on its own merits due to the excessive tampering from the studio.

Of course, if you want to see something new, maybe a movie called "Dark
Shadows" isn't for you. There's always the next "Twilight" movie.

--

Kishin
Wiseguy
2011-05-23 04:42:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Z***@yahoo.com
Post by Kishin
But your point is still valid. Even though the film is only trying to
adapt a small percentage of the overall series, it still has a big
challenge. "House of Dark Shadows" attempted to adapt the Barnabas story
to film, with some success, but then, it didn't get much into the 1795
part.
I for one loved the original Dark Shadows series but absolutely hated
the Dark Shadows movies. I don't think there was anything worthwhile
about either movie. Both movies seemed to be a vain attempt to
cram 1225 epsidoes into a two hour box. The result stunk to high
heavan, came off very badly. I wish that neither movie had
ever been made. For me they ruined a a great series.
Just because you "can" make a movie doesn't mean you should.
When you have movies/shows about vampires there is
so much new territory they could explore
without rehashing the same old tired story lines
that we've seen already.
Just think about all the vampires on various shows that
have been around for many years, think about all that
history they personally wtinessed.
The was one of the great things they had in shows
like Forever Knight and Angel. I'd love to see Dark
Shadows go that route instead of rehashing what
we already saw in 1225 episodes.
Been there, done that.
They hardly tried to cram 1225 episodes (the entire series). Maybe 200
episodes in House.
Oberon
2011-05-23 15:50:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Z***@yahoo.com
Post by Kishin
But your point is still valid. Even though the film is only trying to
adapt a small percentage of the overall series, it still has a big
challenge. "House of Dark Shadows" attempted to adapt the Barnabas
story
Post by Z***@yahoo.com
Post by Kishin
to film, with some success, but then, it didn't get much into the 1795
part.
I for one loved the original Dark Shadows series but absolutely hated
the Dark Shadows movies.   I don't think there was anything worthwhile
about either movie.   Both movies seemed to be a vain attempt to
cram 1225 epsidoes into a two hour box.   The result stunk to high
heavan, came off very badly.   I wish that neither movie had
ever been made.   For me they  ruined a a great series.  
Just because you "can" make a movie doesn't mean you should.
When you have movies/shows about vampires there is
so much new territory they could explore
without rehashing the same old tired story lines
that we've seen already.    
Just think about all the vampires on various shows that
have been around for many years, think about all that
history they personally wtinessed.  
The was one of the great things they had in shows
like Forever Knight and Angel.   I'd love to see Dark
Shadows go that route instead of rehashing what
we already saw in 1225 episodes.
Been there, done that.
They hardly tried to cram 1225 episodes (the entire series).  Maybe 200
episodes in House.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
There is a rumor that they may want to have more than one DS movie,
though it is not clear that Depp or Burton feel that way, but the
studio may see a franchise here...

So... with nary a mention of Josette or even much in the plot line,
the movie could explore the theme of released vampire preys on current
family/village (Victoria being not the center of the story as others
mention). All the time Barnabas struggles with his curse and
reluctance.
Final scene: Barnabas, with Julia or others' help finally begins to
accept himself. Then he goes into the Coffee Shop and sees Maggie...
and says " . . . . Josette?" thereby creating the momentum
towards a sequel?

Oberon
m***@comcast.net
2011-05-23 20:44:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Oberon
Post by Z***@yahoo.com
Post by Kishin
But your point is still valid. Even though the film is only trying to
adapt a small percentage of the overall series, it still has a big
challenge. "House of Dark Shadows" attempted to adapt the Barnabas
story
Post by Z***@yahoo.com
Post by Kishin
to film, with some success, but then, it didn't get much into the 1795
part.
I for one loved the original Dark Shadows series but absolutely hated
the Dark Shadows movies.   I don't think there was anything worthwhile
about either movie.   Both movies seemed to be a vain attempt to
cram 1225 epsidoes into a two hour box.   The result stunk to high
heavan, came off very badly.   I wish that neither movie had
ever been made.   For me they  ruined a a great series.  
Just because you "can" make a movie doesn't mean you should.
When you have movies/shows about vampires there is
so much new territory they could explore
without rehashing the same old tired story lines
that we've seen already.    
Just think about all the vampires on various shows that
have been around for many years, think about all that
history they personally wtinessed.  
The was one of the great things they had in shows
like Forever Knight and Angel.   I'd love to see Dark
Shadows go that route instead of rehashing what
we already saw in 1225 episodes.
Been there, done that.
They hardly tried to cram 1225 episodes (the entire series).  Maybe 200
episodes in House.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
There is a rumor that they may want to have more than one DS movie,
though it is not clear that Depp or Burton feel that way, but the
studio may see a franchise here...
So... with nary a mention of Josette or even much in the plot line,
the movie could explore the theme of released vampire preys on current
family/village (Victoria being not the center of the story as others
mention).  All the time Barnabas struggles with his curse and
reluctance.
 Final scene:  Barnabas, with Julia or others' help finally begins to
accept himself.  Then he goes into the Coffee Shop and sees Maggie...
and says    " . . . . Josette?"   thereby creating the momentum
towards a sequel?
Oberon- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
And then the Duhn duhn duuuuhn" music.. fade to black.. cue
Theremin...
~;o}
Kishin
2011-05-23 21:18:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@comcast.net
Post by Oberon
Post by Wiseguy
Post by Z***@yahoo.com
Post by Kishin
But your point is still valid. Even though the film is only trying to
adapt a small percentage of the overall series, it still has a big
challenge. "House of Dark Shadows" attempted to adapt the Barnabas
story
Post by Z***@yahoo.com
Post by Kishin
to film, with some success, but then, it didn't get much into the 1795
part.
I for one loved the original Dark Shadows series but absolutely hated
the Dark Shadows movies. I don't think there was anything worthwhile
about either movie. Both movies seemed to be a vain attempt to
cram 1225 epsidoes into a two hour box. The result stunk to high
heavan, came off very badly. I wish that neither movie had
ever been made. For me they ruined a a great series.
Just because you "can" make a movie doesn't mean you should.
When you have movies/shows about vampires there is
so much new territory they could explore
without rehashing the same old tired story lines
that we've seen already.
Just think about all the vampires on various shows that
have been around for many years, think about all that
history they personally wtinessed.
The was one of the great things they had in shows
like Forever Knight and Angel. I'd love to see Dark
Shadows go that route instead of rehashing what
we already saw in 1225 episodes.
Been there, done that.
They hardly tried to cram 1225 episodes (the entire series). Maybe 200
episodes in House.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
There is a rumor that they may want to have more than one DS movie,
though it is not clear that Depp or Burton feel that way, but the
studio may see a franchise here...
So... with nary a mention of Josette or even much in the plot line,
the movie could explore the theme of released vampire preys on current
family/village (Victoria being not the center of the story as others
mention). All the time Barnabas struggles with his curse and
reluctance.
Final scene: Barnabas, with Julia or others' help finally begins to
accept himself. Then he goes into the Coffee Shop and sees Maggie...
and says " . . . . Josette?" thereby creating the momentum
towards a sequel?
Oberon- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
And then the Duhn duhn duuuuhn" music.. fade to black.. cue
Theremin...
~;o}
That would be awesome.

--

Kishin
m***@comcast.net
2011-05-23 22:52:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kishin
Post by m***@comcast.net
Post by Oberon
Post by Z***@yahoo.com
Post by Kishin
But your point is still valid. Even though the film is only trying to
adapt a small percentage of the overall series, it still has a big
challenge. "House of Dark Shadows" attempted to adapt the Barnabas
story
Post by Z***@yahoo.com
Post by Kishin
to film, with some success, but then, it didn't get much into the 1795
part.
I for one loved the original Dark Shadows series but absolutely hated
the Dark Shadows movies.   I don't think there was anything worthwhile
about either movie.   Both movies seemed to be a vain attempt to
cram 1225 epsidoes into a two hour box.   The result stunk to high
heavan, came off very badly.   I wish that neither movie had
ever been made.   For me they  ruined a a great series.
Just because you "can" make a movie doesn't mean you should.
When you have movies/shows about vampires there is
so much new territory they could explore
without rehashing the same old tired story lines
that we've seen already.
Just think about all the vampires on various shows that
have been around for many years, think about all that
history they personally wtinessed.
The was one of the great things they had in shows
like Forever Knight and Angel.   I'd love to see Dark
Shadows go that route instead of rehashing what
we already saw in 1225 episodes.
Been there, done that.
They hardly tried to cram 1225 episodes (the entire series).  Maybe 200
episodes in House.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
There is a rumor that they may want to have more than one DS movie,
though it is not clear that Depp or Burton feel that way, but the
studio may see a franchise here...
So... with nary a mention of Josette or even much in the plot line,
the movie could explore the theme of released vampire preys on current
family/village (Victoria being not the center of the story as others
mention).  All the time Barnabas struggles with his curse and
reluctance.
  Final scene:  Barnabas, with Julia or others' help finally begins to
accept himself.  Then he goes into the Coffee Shop and sees Maggie...
and says    " . . . . Josette?"   thereby creating the momentum
towards a sequel?
Oberon- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
And then the Duhn duhn duuuuhn" music.. fade to black.. cue
Theremin...
~;o}
That would be awesome.
--
Kishin- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
LOL Wouldn't it?
I occasionally play the Soundtrack, like at Halloween and such and i
LOVE the little bits of "incidental" music. Some crack me up just out
of memory. There is one i call "Squirrells" because that's what it
reminds me of.
Kishin
2011-05-24 14:41:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@comcast.net
Post by Kishin
Post by m***@comcast.net
Post by Oberon
Post by Wiseguy
Post by Z***@yahoo.com
Post by Kishin
But your point is still valid. Even though the film is only trying to
adapt a small percentage of the overall series, it still has a big
challenge. "House of Dark Shadows" attempted to adapt the Barnabas
story
Post by Z***@yahoo.com
Post by Kishin
to film, with some success, but then, it didn't get much into the 1795
part.
I for one loved the original Dark Shadows series but absolutely hated
the Dark Shadows movies. I don't think there was anything worthwhile
about either movie. Both movies seemed to be a vain attempt to
cram 1225 epsidoes into a two hour box. The result stunk to high
heavan, came off very badly. I wish that neither movie had
ever been made. For me they ruined a a great series.
Just because you "can" make a movie doesn't mean you should.
When you have movies/shows about vampires there is
so much new territory they could explore
without rehashing the same old tired story lines
that we've seen already.
Just think about all the vampires on various shows that
have been around for many years, think about all that
history they personally wtinessed.
The was one of the great things they had in shows
like Forever Knight and Angel. I'd love to see Dark
Shadows go that route instead of rehashing what
we already saw in 1225 episodes.
Been there, done that.
They hardly tried to cram 1225 episodes (the entire series). Maybe 200
episodes in House.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
There is a rumor that they may want to have more than one DS movie,
though it is not clear that Depp or Burton feel that way, but the
studio may see a franchise here...
So... with nary a mention of Josette or even much in the plot line,
the movie could explore the theme of released vampire preys on current
family/village (Victoria being not the center of the story as others
mention). All the time Barnabas struggles with his curse and
reluctance.
Final scene: Barnabas, with Julia or others' help finally begins to
accept himself. Then he goes into the Coffee Shop and sees Maggie...
and says " . . . . Josette?" thereby creating the momentum
towards a sequel?
Oberon- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
And then the Duhn duhn duuuuhn" music.. fade to black.. cue
Theremin...
~;o}
That would be awesome.
--
Kishin- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
LOL Wouldn't it?
I occasionally play the Soundtrack, like at Halloween and such and i
LOVE the little bits of "incidental" music. Some crack me up just out
of memory. There is one i call "Squirrells" because that's what it
reminds me of.
At one place I used to work at, I replaced the startup sound on my PC
with that "Duhn duhn duuuuhn" music. It was cool.

--

Kishin
Artys
2011-05-30 22:26:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@comcast.net
Post by Oberon
Post by Z***@yahoo.com
Post by Kishin
But your point is still valid. Even though the film is only trying to
adapt a small percentage of the overall series, it still has a big
challenge. "House of Dark Shadows" attempted to adapt the Barnabas
story
Post by Z***@yahoo.com
Post by Kishin
to film, with some success, but then, it didn't get much into the 1795
part.
I for one loved the original Dark Shadows series but absolutely hated
the Dark Shadows movies.   I don't think there was anything worthwhile
about either movie.   Both movies seemed to be a vain attempt to
cram 1225 epsidoes into a two hour box.   The result stunk to high
heavan, came off very badly.   I wish that neither movie had
ever been made.   For me they  ruined a a great series.  
Just because you "can" make a movie doesn't mean you should.
When you have movies/shows about vampires there is
so much new territory they could explore
without rehashing the same old tired story lines
that we've seen already.    
Just think about all the vampires on various shows that
have been around for many years, think about all that
history they personally wtinessed.  
The was one of the great things they had in shows
like Forever Knight and Angel.   I'd love to see Dark
Shadows go that route instead of rehashing what
we already saw in 1225 episodes.
Been there, done that.
They hardly tried to cram 1225 episodes (the entire series).  Maybe 200
episodes in House.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
There is a rumor that they may want to have more than one DS movie,
though it is not clear that Depp or Burton feel that way, but the
studio may see a franchise here...
So... with nary a mention of Josette or even much in the plot line,
the movie could explore the theme of released vampire preys on current
family/village (Victoria being not the center of the story as others
mention).  All the time Barnabas struggles with his curse and
reluctance.
 Final scene:  Barnabas, with Julia or others' help finally begins to
accept himself.  Then he goes into the Coffee Shop and sees Maggie...
and says    " . . . . Josette?"   thereby creating the momentum
towards a sequel?
Oberon- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
And then the Duhn duhn duuuuhn" music.. fade to black.. cue
Theremin...
~;o}
Yes, these sound promising. Leaves out Quentin, I see.

Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...